Web0723212 Justin Andrew Harvey v. Commonwealth of Virginia 01/24/2024 ... 0732212 Stephen James Hood v. Commonwealth of Virginia 08/23/2024 ... judgment of trial court affirmed where, based upon the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2024), does not mandate that we reverse appellant’s ... WebMay 17, 2024 · Harvey argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for assault and battery based on her words alone. The Commonwealth asserts that the …
HARVEY v. COMMONWEALTH (2015) FindLaw
WebFeb 12, 2002 · See Shears v. Commonwealth, 23 Va.App. 394, 400, 477 S.E.2d 309, 312 (1996). However, it does not apply where the same conduct is used to support convictions for separate and distinct crimes. See Thomas v. Commonwealth, 244 Va. 1, 9, 419 S.E.2d 606, 610 (1992). The robbery of Amos of her purse was a separate and distinct act, apart … WebFeb 5, 2002 · The Commonwealth cites McCain v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 483, 545 S.E.2d 541 (2001), and Garrison v. Commonwealth, 36 Va.App. 298, 549 S.E.2d 634 (2001), as authority to demonstrate the encounter between Davis and the police was consensual. Both cases are readily distinguishable from the case at bar. de paul basketball tournament history
DAVIS v. COMMONWEALTH (2002) FindLaw
WebMay 11, 1993 · Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay, 9 Va.App. 152, 157, 384 S.E.2d 622, 625 (1989); Crews v. Commonwealth, 3 Va.App. 531, 535-36, 352 S.E.2d 1, 3 (1987). Therefore, in determining the meaning of "firearm" as used in Code § 18.2-308.2, we look to the meaning of that term in other parts of Title 18.2 and to the statutory scheme of Title … WebDocket Nº: Record No. 1460-15-3: Citation: 67 Va.App. 567, 797 S.E.2d 801: Case Date: April 11, 2024: Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia WebOct 13, 2015 · Commonwealth v. Amos, 287 Va. 301, 305–06, 754 S.E.2d 304, 306–07 (2014) (citation omitted). First, Code § 19.2–295.3 requires trial courts to permit victims to testify concerning the impact of the crime on the victim. The statute thus limits a trial court's broad discretion to exclude such testimony, and it clarifies that a jury may ... f hunziker co ag